">

  • Tweet

  • Post

  • Share

  • Save

  • Get PDF

  • Buy Copies

  • Print

Inquire a professional in the business what the key to success is in advertising, and you'll most likely become an answer that echoes the mantra of Stephan Vogel, Ogilvy & Mather Germany'south chief creative officer: "Nothing is more efficient than creative advertising. Creative advertising is more memorable, longer lasting, works with less media spending, and builds a fan customs…faster."

But are artistic ads more effective in inspiring people to buy products than ads that simply catalogue production attributes or benefits? Numerous laboratory experiments have found that creative messages go more attention and lead to positive attitudes about the products existence marketed, but in that location'southward no firm evidence that shows how those messages influence purchase beliefs. Similarly, in that location is remarkably trivial empirical enquiry that ties creative messaging to bodily sales revenues. Because production and make managers—and the agencies pitching to them—have lacked a systematic mode to assess the effectiveness of their ads, artistic advertising has been a crapshoot.

Drawing on research in communications psychology, nosotros have adult a consumer survey arroyo for measuring perceived inventiveness forth five dimensions. We applied this arroyo in a study of 437 TV advertising campaigns for 90 fast-moving consumer goods brands in Germany from January 2005 to October 2010. We asked a panel of trained consumer raters to appraise the creativity of the ads, and we examined the relationships betwixt their perceptions and sales figures for the products. All the product categories we studied—torso lotion, chewing mucilage, coffee, cola and lemonade, detergent, facial care, shampoo, shavers, and yogurt—are highly competitive and invest heavily in advertising.

Our findings confirm the conventional wisdom that creativity matters: Overall, more than-creative campaigns were more constructive—considerably then. We also establish that certain dimensions of inventiveness are more effective than others in influencing purchasing beliefs—and that many companies focus on the incorrect dimensions in their campaigns. Moreover, we believe that by tailoring the survey model to reflect the cultural preferences and triggers of consumers in different geographic markets, companies the globe over can dramatically better their ability to predict the probable effectiveness of their artistic ads and thus make smarter investments.

What Is Creativity?

In coming upwards with dimensions forth which to mensurate creativity, we drew on social and educational psychology literature that defines inventiveness as divergent thinking—namely, the ability to detect unusual and nonobvious solutions to a problem. Ane of the pioneers in the field was Ellis Paul Torrance, an American psychologist, who developed the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT), a bombardment of measures used to appraise individuals' capacity for divergent thinking in the concern world and in didactics. Torrance scored responses to examination questions along five dimensions: fluency, originality, and elaboration (borrowed from the piece of work of Joy Paul Guilford, another American psychologist) every bit well as abstractness and what he called resistance to premature closure.

Fluency refers to the number of relevant ideas proposed in response to a given question (such as "listing as many uses as you lot can for a newspaper clip"), and originality measures how uncommon or unique the responses are. Elaboration refers to the amount of item given in a response, and abstractness measures the degree to which a slogan or a discussion moves beyond being a label for something concrete. Resistance to premature closure measures the ability to consider a multifariousness of factors when processing information.

In the early 2000s Torrance'southward measures were adapted for advertising by the Indiana Academy communications researcher Robert Smith and his colleagues. They adjusted the definition of creativity to refer to "the extent to which an ad contains brand or executional elements that are different, novel, unusual, original, unique, etc." Their goal was to measure out creativity using only those factors near relevant to an advertizement context. They came up with 5 dimensions of advertising creativity, which form the basis for our survey.

To assess the creativity of your advertizing entrada, inquire consumer respondents to score the ads on each dimension, on a scale of 1 to 7, by considering the questions listed below. (These questions, based on communications researcher Robert Smith'southward construct for measuring advertising creativity, are meant to be somewhat overlapping.)

Your campaign's overall creativity rating is the boilerplate of the scores of each dimension. Past comparison the scores of different campaigns, and analyzing the budget and sales effectiveness for each, yous tin amend your ability to predict the likely effectiveness of your creative ads and make smarter investments.

Originality
  • Is the ad "out of the ordinary"?
  • Does it depart from stereotypical thinking?
  • Is it unique?

Coca-Cola "Happiness Factory"

Flexibility
  • Does the ad comprise ideas that motility from one subject to another?
  • Does it comprise different ideas?
  • Does it shift from i idea to another?

Jacobs Krönung "Fourth dimension for Chatting"

Elaboration
  • Does the ad contain numerous details?
  • Does it extend basic ideas and brand them more intricate?
  • Does information technology contain more details than expected?

Ehrmann Yogurt "Strawberry Tongue"

Synthesis
  • Does the ad connect objects that are usually unrelated?
  • Does information technology contain unusual connections?
  • Does it bring unusual items together?

Wrigley'south Juicy Fruit Squish "Juicy Fruit Ranch"

Artistic Value
  • Is the advertizement visually or verbally distinctive?
  • Does information technology brand ideas come up to life graphically or verbally?
  • Is information technology artistic in its product?

Danone Fantasia "Flavor Trip"

Originality.

An original ad comprises elements that are rare or surprising, or that motion away from the obvious and commonplace. The focus is on the uniqueness of the ideas or features contained in the ad. An advertizement can diverge from norms or experiences by applying unique visual or verbal solutions, for instance. Many ad campaigns are annihilation but original. The prototypical detergent spot shows a homemaker satisfied with an even whiter wash; perfumes feature picture-perfect models; and cars prowl through beautiful landscapes free of traffic. 1 campaign nosotros studied that excelled in the originality dimension was the surprising visualization of the inside of a vending machine in the Coca-Cola commercial "Happiness Mill."

Flexibility.

An ad scoring high on flexibility smoothly links the production to a range of different uses or ideas. For instance, a commercial for the Kraft Foods coffee make Jacobs Krönung, which aired in Germany in 2011 and 2012, showed a human facing various domestic challenges (washing dishes, sewing a button on a jacket, dicing an onion, and making a bed) while a group of women enjoyed a cup of coffee together.

Elaboration.

Many ads contain unexpected details or extend simple ideas so that they go more intricate and complicated. One practiced case is an ad for Ehrmann fruit yogurt—i of the leading brands in Federal republic of germany—in which a adult female eating yogurt licks her lips to reveal that her tongue looks just like a strawberry (Ehrmann made dissimilar versions of the spot for different flavors), considerably deepening the idea of fruitiness in yogurt. In another instance, an ad for Wrigley's v mucilage, a man is submerged in tiny metal balls that bounciness off his skin to stand for the tingle ane feels while chewing the mucilage.

Synthesis.

This dimension of creativity is well-nigh blending or connecting commonly unrelated objects or ideas. For example, Wrigley aired a commercial that featured rabbits corralled like cattle and fed bananas, berries, and melon, making their buckteeth grow in every bit Juicy Fruit Squish chewing gum. The commercial combines unrelated objects (rabbits and chewing gum) to create a divergent story line.

Creative value.

Ads with a high level of artistic creativity incorporate aesthetically appealing verbal, visual, or audio elements. Their product quality is high, their dialogue is clever, their color palette is original, or their music is memorable. As a effect, consumers oftentimes view the ads as almost a piece of art rather than a blatant sales pitch. I advertisement nosotros studied, which scored among the highest in artistic value, was an animated commercial for Danone'due south Fantasia yogurt that aired at the end of 2009. It showed a adult female floating on a flower petal through a sea of Fantasia yogurt, surrounded by flowers laden with fruits.

In our report, we asked a panel of trained consumer raters to score the German TV advertizement campaigns on each of these dimensions, on a scale of ane to 7; the campaign's overall creativity rating was the average of its scores. We so looked for relationships between each campaign'south score, its advertising budget, and the entrada's relative sales effectiveness. (For a brief give-and-take of the statistical methods we used in our study, run into the sidebar "Choosing the Right Model.")

In analyzing the relationship between inventiveness and advertizing effectiveness, companies typically use sales response models that are based on conventional regression analyses. We accept establish, still, that such regression is problematic because it assumes that the input variables (creativity and advertisement budget, say) are independent of i another in their effect. In the real world, the longer a creative advertizement is aired, the more than impact the creativity has on sales.

That's why we use a hierarchical sales response model. Hierarchical models become effectually the problem by nesting one regression model within another. This allows us to see both the direct impact of creativity on sales and the amplifying effect of the budget, and thus arrive at a more than authentic overall estimate of the event of creativity on sales.

What Nosotros Found

Our study revealed dramatic variation in overall inventiveness scores across the campaigns. The average score for overall creativity was 2.98 (again, on a calibration of 1 to seven). The everyman score was 1.0, and the highest 6.2. Merely eleven of the 437 campaigns received an overall score higher up 5 (five of them were cola campaigns). At the other stop of the spectrum, 10 campaigns had an overall score below 1.v. The scores mattered a lot, we found. A euro invested in a highly creative ad campaign had, on average, most double the sales impact of a euro spent on a noncreative campaign. The impact of inventiveness was initially relatively small simply typically gathered momentum as the entrada rolled out.

A euro invested in a highly creative ad campaign had nearly double the sales affect of a euro spent on a noncreative campaign.

We uncovered two interesting insights about how inventiveness enhances sales numbers.

The dimensions take varying levels of influence on sales.

Companies have plenty of room for improvement in the creativity of advert campaigns. For instance, the types of creativity that agencies currently emphasize are often non the near effective ones at driving sales. In our research, we quantified the impact that each dimension has on sales. Although all of them had a positive impact, elaboration had past far the most powerful one (one.32 when indexed relative to the overall boilerplate creativity of 1.0), followed by artistic value (one.nineteen). Trailing behind were originality (1.06) and flexibility (1.03), with synthesis a afar fifth (0.45). Notwithstanding the study shows that advertisement agencies use originality and artistic value more than they utilize elaboration. Perhaps, companies think primarily of originality when trying to be creative.

Nosotros also looked at campaigns that scored higher up the median on at least two dimensions and establish that the variation in sales impact among the combinations was even greater than the variation between individual dimensions. Out of ten possible pairs, nosotros found that the nearly-used combination—flexibility and elaboration, accounting for well-nigh 12% of all combinations—is one of the lowest-performing: 0.41 indexed relative to the average of all pairs of one.0. In sharp contrast, combining elaboration with originality (accounting for nearly ten% of all combos identified) had almost double the average affect on sales (i.96), closely followed by the combination of artistic value and originality (1.89, accounting for almost 11% of all combos).

When used in combination, creativity dimensions had widely varying effects. Relative effectiveness here shows the sales uplift a item pairing enjoyed relative to boilerplate effectiveness. Despite the disparities, nonetheless, companies in our study used the x combinations in roughly equal proportion (shown here as a percentage of total usage), suggesting that many firms are not getting the near out of their advertising investments.

The virtually-used pairing, flexibility plus elaboration, is one of the to the lowest degree constructive. The most effective pairing, originality plus elaboration, had almost double the impact. Flexibility is i of the to the lowest degree constructive dimensions, whether used alone or in combination. Although originality has little touch on on sales on its own, it appears to play an important enabling role, appearing in three of the four most effective pairings.

Interestingly, originality is often part of the most effective combinations, suggesting that this type of creativity plays an important enabling role. In essence, existence original is non enough—originality boosts sales only in the presence of additional creative dimensions. Indeed, originality's power to enable may be another reason that then many companies use it in advert campaigns, despite its mediocre individual effectiveness.

Use of creativity differs by category.

Levels of creativity vary significantly across product categories, with the overall scores ranging from ii.62 for shampoo to 3.60 for cola. In categories such as cola and coffee, advertisers and customers tend to favor higher levels of inventiveness, whereas in categories such every bit shampoo, body care, and facial care, campaigns focus on showing the bodily use of the production, albeit in an idealized environment. I reason could be that information technology is still important in certain categories to deliver factual proof points of performance features. When products are functional and oriented toward clear consumer goals (cleaning garments with detergents, protecting skin with body lotion), unorthodox approaches are less preferred. In contrast, when products are easily understood, similar, and tied to personal preferences (quenching thirst with a soda, for instance, or enjoying a loving cup of coffee), an out-of-the-ordinary approach can exist more effective in stimulating sales.

Nosotros likewise looked at whether investing in boosted creativity pays off and found that it depends entirely on the category. Every bit the exhibit "Is More than Creativity Ameliorate?" shows, in traditionally depression-creativity categories, calculation creativity can pay off; co-ordinate to our written report, a ane-point increase in inventiveness scores for shampoo and detergent advert campaigns boosted sales impact by four%. However, the body lotion and face care categories, which also tend to feature depression levels of creativity, were harmed by additional inventiveness: Sales impact fell past nearly two%. We run into variation across categories with high levels of creativity. Investing in additional creativity has a nearly eight% impact on sales in shavers and java but boosts impact by less than 1% for colas and yogurts. So make certain you lot understand your category'due south sensitivity to creativity before you lot commission that loftier-priced category-redefining campaign.

If creative ads can inspire consumers to purchase, does amping up the inventiveness level drive fifty-fifty more purchases? Not necessarily. According to our study of German language ads, the relative effectiveness of adding creativity to a entrada can vary significantly.

Categories usually associated with highly creative ads—such equally coffee or cola—do non e'er get a large boost when more creativity is added to campaigns…

…and among categories associated with low creativity—such as detergents and torso lotions—getting creative is not always a bad idea.

Measuring Campaign Effectiveness

Our research has large implications for advertising agencies and the companies that appoint them. Advert professionals tin can use methods like ours to identify where to direct their creative energies to best effect. Companies can employ the models to guess the fiscal impact their artistic investments volition produce.

In many—indeed, most—cases, companies will observe that they are underinvesting in creativity. Our research clearly shows that the conservative approaches adopted in many product categories are leaving money on the table. Increased investment volition usually pay for itself: More-effective creative ads volition let other parts of the advertisement budget to be significantly reduced.

The conservative approaches adopted in many product categories are leaving money on the table.

For example, suppose a visitor plans to air ii TV campaigns: Campaign A has a inventiveness index rating of 3, and it has allocated a TV upkeep of €500,000 per week. Campaign B has a rating of 3.5, but because it costs more to create the campaign, it plans to spend only €400,000 per week for airtime. (The company establishes inventiveness ratings past asking consumer panels to evaluate entrada drafts and storyboards along the five dimensions.)

After feeding the scores and budgets into a hierarchical sales response model (for this hypothetical example, nosotros used information from our study), the visitor estimates that the sales impact for Campaign B will be ane.07% higher in the first week of ambulation than that of Campaign A. In the subsequent weeks, the gap increases to 1.93% (week 2), 2.63% (week three), and 3.xix% (week 4), thanks to carryover and buildup of consumer knowledge and goodwill. That ways that diverting money from the airtime upkeep to artistic volition in this case outcome in a more effective advert. In fact, the model shows that the visitor could cut airtime spending to €330,000 earlier the negative bear on of reduced airtime outweighed the positive event of creativity.

Companies tin can also use a survey approach to gauge the impact of particular creative choices. Permit's say that your product category is coffee, and you take to cull between two artistic pitches that both scored 4.0, each with a €400,000 weekly airtime budget. Campaign C emphasizes elaboration and originality, and Campaign D emphasizes artistic value and synthesis. Our findings suggest that Campaign C would be the better bet, since that combination of inventiveness dimensions produces a positive effect on sales nigh three times as nifty every bit that of the philharmonic used in Campaign D.Inventiveness isn't easily engineered—and it is still largely measurable only later on the fact. What'south more, a focus-group assessment of an unaired campaign'southward creativity levels may well be off the mark. Nonetheless, companies tin can apply a model similar ours, coupled with sound baseline information, to improve footing the process of creating advertising ideas and assessing their value. And in so doing, they can put to good use quite a bit more than the famous half of their ad budgets.

A version of this commodity appeared in the June 2013 event of Harvard Business Review.